Wednesday, November 13, 2013




Society was introduced to a missing little girl, Caylee Marie Anthony On July 15, 2008. She was a 2-year-old who lived with her with her mother, Casey Marie Anthony, and her maternal grandparents, George and Cindy Anthony. Cindy made a horrific phone call to 911 saying that she had not seen Caylee for 31 days and that Casey's car smelled like a dead body had been inside it. Cindy said Casey had given varied explanations as to Caylee's whereabouts before finally telling her that she had not seen Caylee for weeks. Several suspicious questions were raised in society when Casey tried to collect many falsehoods, excuses, and reasons for why her daughter went missing. For one, Casey told detectives that a nanny had kidnapped the child and that she had been trying to find her. For two, Casey had lied about where she was and what she did for a living. Casey explained to detectives that she was simply too frightened to alert the authorities that her daughter had gone missing.
When news broke out that Caylee had disappeared, pictures of her dancing on stripper poles and drinks in her hands showed that Casey did not have a care in the world. Audiences that were reached and affected were those that desired cultural changes. These individuals and families across the nation were shocked at Casey’s misbehavior when Caylee was supposedly “mssing”.
After a long time of searching for Caylee, a meter reader found a suspicious object near the Anthony residence. Sheriffs went out to see what it might be and in fact found the remains of Caylee Anthony. With more investigating, detectives found Google searches of “neck breaking” and how to make “chloroform”. People may wonder, is this woman crazy to kill her child and thinking she could get away with it (Hayes, 2011) ?
Consider, if she had to lie in the first place to try and cover herself, this may mean she is not insane. Someone who is insane does something with out control. Lying shows that she knows what she did and possibly could of prevented this. Casey had done this in the “right mind” so to speak and is a cold-blooded killer.
After 33 days of testimony, 400 pieces of evidence and more than 90 witnesses, dedicated viewers were on the edge of their seats waiting for the guilty verdict. The jury in the Casey Anthony case had finally reached a verdict Casey Anthony was found not guilty (Lohr, 2011).
In today’s world, it is important to not focus on the “hard evidence” of cases. As this happens, we lose sight of what is in right front of us, a killer. Did the jurors miss what Casey did? Did they over look the moral and ethics behind this case? I believe so. They failed to dig deeper about Casey’s motive behind her lies and her actions while her daughter went missing. They focused on the physical evidence and not so much common sense. With all of the lies and evidence of finding Google searches of “neck breaking” and how to make “chloroform”, usually raises a red flag. However, the jurors seemed to disagree.
What does this say about the justice system? More importantly, where is justice for Caylee? Will we continue to let selfish and self-centered killers free? Today, we still do not know “who” killed this innocent young child. Yet, we do have the satisfaction that Casey has to spend the rest of her life in hiding and fear from those that know the truth—that she is responsible for the murder of her 2-year-old daughter.

Hayes, A. (2011, July 5). Casey anthony not guilty of murder, other charges in daughter's death. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/07/05/florida.casey.anthony.trial/
Lohr, D. (2011). Casey anthony trial verdict: Not guilty of first-degree murder (update). Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/05/casey-anthony-trial-verdict_n_890173.html

3 comments:

  1. I do agree with you Kristin. They entire trail process was unfair and society witnessed that a mother got off freely. I do believe their was a Lifetime movie on this particular case and it explained more in detail.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I did not follow this closely when it was in the news. I feel like I would need to watch the movie Carl mentioned to get a better feel of what happened. I do know for sure though that media definitely showed her as guilty and if she did do it, the public will never let her get off without hearing about it. As you said she will need to go into hiding if she wishes to have any peace and quiet.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear Kristen Condrin.... I like your view on this case i do agree that this case was not only very controversy but also an eye opener for our society. I hope that people can open their eyes and be more open about this case so it doesn't turn into such a big deal if it were to happen again.

    ReplyDelete